Business Zone V Engen

Business zone approached the controller and alleged that engen s conduct amounted to an unfair or unreasonable contractual practice.

Business zone v engen. The business zone 1010 cc t a emmarentia convenience centre and engen petroleum limited and others. Particular business zone noted that engen s conduct had worsened since 2009 when business zone had referred a different dispute to arbitration4 business zone. Engen thus advised business zone that the lease agreement had been cancelled.

The business zone 1010 cc t a emmarentia convenience centre v engen petroleum limited and others. Attached is the constitutional court synopses document of the following case. 6 engen did not respond to business zone s demand but in a letter dated 12 october 2010 claimed that business zone had breached the addendum.

It averred that business zone had in contravention of the law or contrary to engen s guidelines effected certain alterations to the leased premises without its prior written consent. 4 on 17 june 2009 business zone requested the controller to refer certain unfair and unreasonable allegedly contractual practices to an arbitrator. 8 the business zone 1010 cc t a emmarentia convenience centre v engen petroleum limited and others 2017 zacc 2 9 marndre beleggings cc v minister of energy case number 51067 15 delivered 22 march 2018.